Discovery Tools & Methods

Conjoint Analysis

Quantitative survey method that identifies which combinations of features or attributes matter most to customers.

Overview

Conjoint Analysis is a quantitative survey method that helps identify which combinations of features or attributes matter most to customers. Within GLIDR, this technique supports product feature testing by:

  1. Creating assumptions for each feature being tested
  2. Connecting those ideas to an Experiment with specific hypotheses
  3. Running the Experiment and attaching the Conjoint Analysis as Evidence
  4. Analyzing learnings and updating the project accordingly

In Brief

A complex survey method where customers choose between product offerings with different attributes (price, screen size, weight, etc.). Statistical analysis reveals the relative value of each attribute and predicts values for feature combinations.

Helps Answer

Tags

Quantitative, Pricing, Revenue, Value Proposition

Description

Time Commitment and Resources

Analysis requires 1-2 hours offline for B2C or 24 hours online for response gathering. B2B recruitment varies widely. Data analysis is rapid for fewer than 10 attributes using off-the-shelf software; analyzing dozens of factors may require weeks and expert consultation.

How To

  1. Identify top 3-5 product attributes based on prior research and consumer understanding
  2. Calculate sample size using: [(Total # of levels for all attributes) - (Number of attributes + 1)] × 10
  3. Use software to mix attributes into new product offerings
  4. Show participants selected offerings side-by-side for preference selection
  5. Employ statistical analysis software to compute relative value rankings for each attribute
  6. Generate formula revealing the "ideal" product based on optimized attribute mix

Three phone plans compared on price, minutes, rollover, free calling and market share

Interpreting Results

Utility points for each attribute level, with the share of respondents who prefer each level

Results can be statistically complex and difficult to understand. Various display methods exist—from detailed statistical outputs to simplified relative parts-worth sensitivity analyses. What matters most is: the relative importance of each attribute compared with the others; the formula that allows you to predict relative preferences of any mix; elasticity of demand for pricing simulations.

Relative preference chart for television attributes: brand, screen size, sound, channel blockout, picture-in-picture and price

Key considerations:

Potential Biases

Spreadsheet of utilities and attribute importances for ten respondents across temperature, sugar, lemon and intensity

Start building better products
Join GLIDR AI to take off.